This article reviews the policies and evaluating interpretive accounting research (IAR) deals In order to present an interpretation of Accounting Research status and commonalities between the main body and the investigation will examine critical accounting.Interpretive accounting research is a broad concept that involves multiple meanings and Classical theories in the social sciences often linked And modern and postmodern social theory tries to deny Therefore, the role and function of affect and Accounting The Research Scholars Encourage this kind of research focus Several methods have been proposed to achieve this Today, researchers sought to define this type of research and provide a separate and distinct academic environment are Today, researchers sought to define this type of research and provide a separate and distinct academic environment are Account has been created based on the interpretation of research results In this paper, the nature of identity, an interpretation of Accounting Research functionality and its position relative to other accounting research has examined Interpretive research-based segmentation Roselender and Dillard kind of research "methodology, philosophical and ideological" is mentioned
Larimi, J., & Mohseni, E. (2014). Interpretative Accounting Research, Challenges and Opportunities in Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting and Social Interests, 4(3), 105-119. doi: 10.22051/ijar.2015.507
MLA
Jafar Larimi; Ebrahim Mohseni. "Interpretative Accounting Research, Challenges and Opportunities in Accounting Research", Journal of Accounting and Social Interests, 4, 3, 2014, 105-119. doi: 10.22051/ijar.2015.507
HARVARD
Larimi, J., Mohseni, E. (2014). 'Interpretative Accounting Research, Challenges and Opportunities in Accounting Research', Journal of Accounting and Social Interests, 4(3), pp. 105-119. doi: 10.22051/ijar.2015.507
VANCOUVER
Larimi, J., Mohseni, E. Interpretative Accounting Research, Challenges and Opportunities in Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting and Social Interests, 2014; 4(3): 105-119. doi: 10.22051/ijar.2015.507