The Relationship between Fraud in Financial the Relationship between Fraud in Financial Reporting of Peer Firms in the Same Geographical Region and Fraud in Company Financial Reporting: The Moderating Role of Industry Competition

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department Of Accounting, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Amin Institute of Higher Education, Fooladshahr, Iran

3 Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Amin Institute of Higher Education, Fooladshahr, Iran.

10.22051/jaasci.2024.46390.1832

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between fraud in the company's financial reporting and fraud in the financial reporting of peer firms active in a similar geographic region, taking into account the moderating effect of competition in the industry.
Research Method: This research is an applied study with an inductive approach and based on panel data analysis. In this research, the information of 11 listed petrochemical firms active in Pars Energy Special Economic Zone during 2011 to 2022 was used for 12 years. Also, for further analysis, the information of 32 listed firms active in petrochemical industry during the same time period has been used.
Results: The results showed that fraud in the financial reporting of active firms in the same geographic region has a positive and significant relationship with fraud in the company's financial reporting. Competition in the industry does not have a significant effect on the intensity of the relationship between fraud in the financial reporting of firms operating in the same geographic area with fraud in the company's financial reporting, but competition in the industry increases the effect of the relationship between fraud in the financial reporting of firms operating in the same geographic region on fraud in reporting. The company is financed.
Conclusion: The findings of this research showed that ethical misconduct and fraudulent financial reporting do not occur in a vacuum, and that neighboring firms have an impact on the willingness to commit violations and fraud in financial reporting.
Contribution This study provides valuable insights into the factors influencing financial reporting fraud, focusing on peer companies in Iran, to provide stakeholders.

Keywords

Main Subjects


جهانشاد، آذیتا؛ سرداری‌زاده، سپیده. (1393). رابطه معیار مالی (اختلاف رشد درآمد) و معیار غیر مالی (رشد تعداد کارکنان) با گزارشگری مالی متقلبانه. حسابداری و منافع اجتماعی، 4(2)، 198-181.
خواجوی، شکرالله؛ ابراهیمی، مهرداد. (1397). بررسی تأثیر سازوکارهای حاکمیت شرکتی بر تقلب در صورت‌های مالی شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. مدیریت دارایی و تأمین مالی، 6(2)، 71-84.
علی‌اصغری، شیوه؛ غیور، فرزاد؛ منصورفر، غلامرضا. (1402). کیفیت حاکمیت شرکتی و مدیریت ذینفعان: نقش میانجی احتمال گزارشگری متقلبانه. حسابداری و منافع اجتماعی، 13(3)، 142-115.
فروغی، داریوش؛ حمیدیان، نرگس؛ بهرامی، فاطمه. (1401). تأثیر مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت‌ها بر گزارشگری مالی متقلبانه. دانش حسابداری مالی، 9(1)، 1-27.
لعل بار، علی؛ حسنی، محسن. (1400). توانایی مدیریتی، ارتباطات سیاسی و گزارشگری مالی متقلبانه. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی دفاع ملی، 5 (20)، 141-162.
Ali Asghari, S.h; Ghayur, F; & Mansoorfar, Gh. (2023). The quality of corporate governance and stakeholder management: the mediating role of the probability of fraudulent reporting. Accounting and Social Interest, 13(3), 115-142. (In Persian).
Andergassen, R. (2016). Managerial compensation, product market competition and fraud. Journal of Economics and Finance, 45, 1–15.
Awolowo, I. F. (2019). Financial Statement Fraud: The Need for a Paradigm Shift to Forensic Accounting. PHD thesis, Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA).
Bereskin, F; Campbell, T; & Kedia, S. (2019). Whistle Blowing, Forced CEO Turnover, and Misconduct: The Role of Socially Minded Employees and Directors. Management Science, 66 (1), 1-43.
Bird, A; Edwards, A; & Ruchti, T. G. (2018). Taxes and Peer Effects. The Accounting Review, 93(5), 97–117.
Braun, M; Truffa, S; & Valdivieso, E. (2022). The Social Geography of Misconduct (April 13, 2022). Proceedings of the EUROFIDAI-ESSEC Paris December Finance Meeting 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4260848 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4260848.
Del Prete, D; Di Maio, M; & Rahman, A. (2023). Firms amid conflict: Performance, production inputs, and market competition. Journal of Development Economics, 164, 1-14.
Duong, H. K; Ngo, A .D; & McGown, C.B. (2015). Industry Peer Effect and the Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt. Managerial Fainance, 41 (17), 714-733.
Ebaid, I. E. S. (2023). Board characteristics and the likelihood of financial statements fraud: empirical evidence from an emerging market. Future Business Journal, 9 (47), 1-12.
Forughi, D; Hamidian, N; & Bahram, F. (2022). The effect of corporate social responsibility on fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge. 9 (1), 1-27. (In Persian).
Fracassi, C. (2017). Corporate finance policies and social networks. Management Science. 63(8):2420–2438.
Foucault, T. & Fresard, L. (2014). Learning from Peers’ Stock Prices and Corporate Investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(3), 554–577.
Iskenderoglu, C. (2023). Product market competition and the value of diversification. Finance Research Letter, 58, 1-11.
Jahanshad, A; & Sardarizadeh, S. (2013). The relationship between financial criteria (income growth difference) and non-financial criteria (employee growth) with fraudulent financial reporting. Accounting and Social Interest, 4(2), 198-181. (in Persian).
Kedia, S.; Koh, K; & Rajgopal, S. (2015). Evidence on contagion in earnings management. Accounting Reviwe, 90 (6), 2337–2373.
Khajavi, Sh; & Ebrahimi, M. (2017). Investigating the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on fraud in the financial statements of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 6(2), 71-84. (In Persian).
Kim, E.H; Lu, Y; Khanna, V. (2015). CEO connectedness and corporate fraud. The Journal of Finance, 70 (3), 1203-1252.
Lalbar, A; & Hasani, M. (2021). Management ability, political communication and fraudulent financial reporting. Strategic management of national defense Studies. 5(20), 141-162. (In Persian).
Mat´ e-S´ anchez-Val, M; Lopez-Hern ´ andez, F; & Fuentes, C.C.R. (2018). Geographical factors and business failure: an empirical study from the Madrid metropolitan area. Economic model, 74, 275–283.
McGuire, S.T; Omer, T.C; & Sharp, N.Y. (2011). The impact of religion on financial reporting irregularities. Accounting Reviwe, 87 (2), 645–673.
Umar, I; Samsudin, R. S; & Mohamed, M. (2015). The types, costs, prevention and detection of occupational fraud: The ACFE perspective. Proceedings of the International Conference on Accounting Studies, 17 (2), 1-5.
Parsons, C.A; Sulaeman, J; & Titman, S. (2018). The geography of financial misconduct. The Journal of Finance, 73 (5), 2087–2137.
Rashid, A; & Farah Said, A. (2021). Peer Effects on Investment Decisions: Do Industry Leaders and Young Firms Behave Differently? Global Business Review, 25, 1-21.
Rind, A. A; Abbassi, W; Allaya, M; & Hammouda, A. (2022). Local peers and firm misconduct: The role of sustainability and competition. Economic Modelling, 116, 1-16.
Robert, H.T; and Henry, N.P. (2016). 29 June. Corporate Fraud Demands Criminal Time. The New York Times.
Shleifer, A. (2004). Does competition destroy ethical behavior? American Economic Review, 94 (2), 414–418