اشتهای ریسک، ریسک تداوم فعالیت ، توانایی و پاسخگویی مدیریت

نوع مقاله : مقاله ترویجی

نویسندگان

1 گروه حسابداری، واحد نیشابور، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نیشابور، ایران

2 گروه حسابداری، واحد تهران شرق، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

3 گروه حسابداری، واحد سبزوار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سبزوار، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به بررسی اشتهای ریسک به‌عنوان ابزار نوین ایجاد رویکرد ریسک محور و کاهش ریسک تداوم فعالیت شرکت و نقش توانایی و پاسخگویی مدیریت می‌پردازد. اسناد اشتهای ریسک در واقع، به‌صورت یکپارچه‌ای رویکرد پیشگیری از ریسک‌های تداوم فعالیت، در همه فعالیت‌های مهم شرکت را توسعه می‌دهند. بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که به هر اندازه، مدیریت در بسط و بکارگیری اسناد اشتهای ریسک در حوزه‌های مختلف شرکت تواناتر باشد، فعالیت‌های بیشتری تحت پوشش فرایند مدیریت ریسک قرار گرفته و فرایندها و بخش‌های بیشتری از شرکت در پیشگیری و مقابله با ریسک‌های تداوم فعالیت درگیر شوند. بررسی پژوهش‌های گذشته نشان می‌دهد، در شرکت‌هایی که مدیریت نسبت به طراحی و استفاده از فرایندها و اسناد اشتهای ریسک در فعالیت‌های مختلف از توانایی لازم برخوردار است، میزان قابل توجهی از ریسک تداوم فعالیت شرکت کاهش یافته است؛ برعکس در شرکت‌هایی که نسبت به طراحی فرایندهای اشتهای ریسک و بکارگیری اسناد اشتهای ریسک در حوزه‌های مختلف فعالیت شرکت، اقدامات لازم انجام نشده است، در مدیریت ریسک‌های مرتبط با تداوم فعالیت، با چالش‌های بیشتری مواجه هستند. نتایج بررسی‌ها موید این موضوع است که توانایی و پاسخگویی مدیریت، به‌عنوان شاخصی مهم در کاهش ریسک تداوم فعالیت شرکت‌ها، نمود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Risk Appetite, Risks of Business Continuity, managerial Ability and Accountability

نویسندگان [English]

  • fatemeh yari 1
  • alireza mehrazeen 1
  • reza yarifard 2
  • abolghasem masihabadi 3
1 Department of accounting, Neyshabur branch, Islamic Azad univercity, Neyshabur, Iran
2 Department of accounting, East Tehran branch, Islamic Azad univercity, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of accounting, sabzever branch, Islamic Azad univercity, sabzevar, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present study investigates the role of managerial ability in designing and using the risk appetite document as one of the new and developed management tools to reduce the risk of continuing the company's activities. The more capable the management is in developing and applying risk appetite documents, the more activities will be covered by the risk management process and the more parts of the company will be involved in preventing and countering the risks of business continuity. Risk appetite documents actually develop an integrated approach to the prevention of business continuity risks in all important activities of the company. The findings of past studies show that in companies where management design the level of risk appetite and use risk appetite documents in the company's activities, significantly reduces the risk of continuing the company's activities. Companies that have not designed and used the risk appetite document, have been challenged to reduce the risks of corporate business continuity. Finally, the results of this study show that the ability of management has emerged as an important indicator in reducing the risk of business continuity of companies.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Integrated Risk Management
  • Managerial Ability and Accountability
  • Risk Appetite
  • Risk-Based Approach
  • Risk of business continuity
Anderson, R. (2011). Risk Appetite & Tolerance Guidance Paper. 2011, issued by the Institute of Risk Management.
Anh, T., Thi, L., Quang, H., & Thi, T. (2020). Factors influencing the effectiveness of internal control in cement manufacturing companies. Management Science Letters, 10(1), pp.133-142.
Bolo, Qasem, Arabi, & Mehran. (2019). Identify the factors affecting the comprehensive risk of state-owned banks. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Public Accounting, 5 (2), pp.25-46. (In Persian)
Becht, M., Bolton, P., & Röell, A. (2011). Why bank governance is different. Oxford review of economic policy, 27(3), pp.437-463.
Barfield, R. (2007). Risk appetite–How hungry are you. The journal: Special risk management edition, pp.8-13.
Boholm, A. (1998). Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research. Journal of risk research, 1(2), pp.135-163.
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2009). Bossonomics: the economics of management and productivity. Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly journal of economics, 118(4), pp.1169-1208.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. The journal of finance, 57(1), pp.1-32.
Culver, J., Burke, W., Yasui, Y., Durfy, S., & Press, N. (2001). Participation in breast cancer genetic counseling: the influence of educational level, ethnic background, and risk perception. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(3), pp.215-231.
Chen, Y., Podolski, E. J., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2015). Does managerial ability facilitate corporate innovative success? Journal of empirical finance, 34, pp.313-326.
Ching, W. C., Mohd-Rahim, F. A., Chuing, L. S., Zainon, N., & Aziz, N. M. (2020). Conceptualising risk culture on Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) implementation in construction companies. Built Environment, 17(1), pp.58-69.
Demerjian, P. R., Lev, B., Lewis, M. F., & McVay, S. E. (2013). Managerial ability and earnings quality. The accounting review, 88(2), pp.463-498.
Erin, O., Bamigboye, O., & Arumona, J. (2020). Risk governance and financial performance: an empirical analysis. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), pp.758-768.
Faertes, D. (2015). Reliability of supply chains and business continuity management. Procedia Computer Science, 55, pp.1400-1409.
Foroughi, E., Sakiani, A. (2016). The effect of managerial ability on investment efficiency. Accounting and Auditing Research, 6 (3), pp.97-126. (in persian)
Gharekhani, M., Nasiri, F. (2015). Determining the Allowable Risk Limits in Risk Management of Insurance Companies. 22 national conference and the 8 international conference on insurance and development, 6 (3), pp.649-691. (In Persian)
KPMG. (2009). Understanding and Articulating Risk Appetite.
Kaplan, S. N., Klebanov, M. M., & Sorensen, M. (2012). Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? The Journal of Finance, 67(3), pp.973-1007.
Kozlowski, M. (2016). The concept of method for determining the minimum level of airport business continuity. Journal of KONBiN, 37(1), 5.
Lawson, B. P., Muriel, L., & Sanders, P. R. (2017). A survey on firms' implementation of COSO's 2013 Internal Control–Integrated Framework. Research in accounting regulation, 29(1), pp.30-43.
Liang, D., Wang, M., Xu, Z., & Liu, D. (2020). Risk appetite dual hesitant fuzzy three-way decisions with TODIM. Information Sciences, 507, pp.585-605.
Li, Z., Ying, Q., Chen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Managerial risk appetite and asymmetry cost behavior: evidence from China. Accounting & Finance, 60(5), pp.4651-4692.
Mehrani, Sasan, Akhundi, Omid. (2018). Systems thinking and its applications in business unit risk management according to Kosovo. Accounting Research, 8 (1), pp.53-68. (In Persian)
Mansol, N. H., Alwi, N. H. M., & Ismail, W. (2016). Managing organizational culture requirement for Business Continuity Management (BCM) implementation using Goal-Question-Metric (GQM) approach. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(12–3), pp.13–22.
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The journal of finance, 60(6), pp.2661-2700.
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction. Journal of financial Economics, 89(1), pp.20-43.
Parise, G., et al., (2016), Switching procedures and business continuity management: the flock logic of multiple source systems.” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 52(1), pp.60-66.
Posch, A. (2020). Integrating risk into control system design: The complementarity between risk-focused results controls and risk-focused information sharing. Accounting, organizations and society, 86, 101126.
Rahman, M. T., Nielsen, R., Khan, M. A., & Ankamah-Yeboah, I. (2020). Impact of management practices and managerial ability on the financial performance of aquaculture farms in Bangladesh. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 24(1), pp.79-101.
Rokhideh, M.R; Ebrahimi, A; khamshaya, A. (2018). Interpretive structural modeling of effective factors in managing business continuity in small and medium enterprises. Business Reviews, 17 (97), pp.114-130. (In Persian)
Rittenberg, L; Martens, F. (2012). COSO Enterprise Risk Management, Understanding and Communicating Risk Appetite. January.
Sousa, V., De Almeida, N. M., & Dias, L. A. (2012). Risk management framework for the construction industry according to the ISO 31000: 2009 standard. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 2(4), pp.261-274.
Safa, Mojgan, Ghazi, Hesami, & Neda. (2020). The relationship between customer focus and tax avoidance with the moderating role of managers' ability. Accounting, Accountability and Community Benefits, 10 (1), pp.91-113.(In persian)
Stolen, K., den Braber, F., Dimitrakos, T., Fredriksen, R., Gran, B. A., Houmb, S. H., & Aagedal, J. O. (2002). Model-based risk assessment–the CORAS approach. In iTrust Workshop.
Sjöberg L, Drottz-Sjöberg BM (1991) Knowledge and risk perception among nuclear power plant employees. Risk Anal 11, pp.607–618.
Schätter, Frank, et al. (2019), “A decision support methodology for a disaster-caused business continuity management.” Decision Support Systems, 118, pp.10-20.
Wang Y, Zhou W, Chang K-C (2013) Effect of decision makers’ education level on their corporate risk taking. Soc Behav Personal Int J ,41, pp.1225–1229
Wati, E. R., Tjaraka, H., & Sudaryati, E. (2020). Do Managerial Ability Impact Indonesian Firm Risk-Taking Behavior? AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(1), pp.18-33.
Yung, K., & Chen, C. (2018). Managerial ability and firm risk-taking behavior. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 51(4), pp.1005-1032.